首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS (R) survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative
【2h】

Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS (R) survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative

机译:评估使用改进的CAHPS(R)调查来支持以患者为中心的护理的改进:质量改进协作的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives To evaluate the use of a modified Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS(R)) survey to support quality improvement in a collaborative focused on patient-centred care, assess subsequent changes in patient experiences, and identify factors that promoted or impeded data use. Background Healthcare systems are increasingly using surveys to assess patients' experiences of care but little is established about how to use these data in quality improvement. Design Process evaluation of a quality improvement collaborative. Setting and participants The CAHPS team from Harvard Medical School and the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement organized a learning collaborative including eight medical groups in Minnesota. Intervention Samples of patients recently visiting each group completed a modified CAHPS(R) survey before, after and continuously over a 12-month project. Teams were encouraged to set goals for improvement using baseline data and supported as they made interventions with bi-monthly collaborative meetings, an online tool reporting the monthly data, a resource manual called The CAHPS(R) Improvement Guide, and conference calls. Main outcome measures Changes in patient experiences. Interviews with team leaders assessed the usefulness of the collaborative resources, lessons and barriers to using data. Results Seven teams set goals and six made interventions. Small improvements in patient experience were observed in some groups, but in others changes were mixed and not consistently related to the team actions. Two successful groups appeared to have strong quality improvement structures and had focussed on relatively simple interventions. Team leaders reported that frequent survey reports were a powerful stimulus to improvement, but that they needed more time and support to engage staff and clinicians in changing their behaviour. Conclusions Small measurable improvements in patient experience may be achieved over short projects. Sustaining more substantial change is likely to require organizational strategies, engaged leadership, cultural change, regular measurement and performance feedback and experience of interpreting and using survey data
机译:目的评估修改后的《医疗服务提供者和系统的消费者评估》(CAHPS(R))调查在支持以患者为中心的护理的合作中支持质量改进的用途,评估患者体验的后续变化,并确定促成或阻碍因素数据使用。背景技术医疗保健系统越来越多地使用调查来评估患者的护理经历,但是关于如何使用这些数据来改善质量的了解很少。质量改进协作的设计过程评估。背景和参与者来自哈佛医学院和临床系统改进研究所的CAHPS团队在明尼苏达州组织了一次学习协作,包括八个医学小组。干预最近访问每个组的患者样本在为期12个月的项目之前,之后和持续进行了改进的CAHPS(R)调查。鼓励团队使用基线数据制定改进目标,并在每两个月进行一次协作会议,进行在线报告每月数据的在线工具,称为《 CAHPS(R)改进指南》的资源手册以及电话会议的干预过程中给予支持。主要结局指标患者经历的变化。与团队负责人的访谈评估了协作资源的有用性,课程和使用数据的障碍。结果七个小组设定了目标,六个小组进行了干预。在某些小组中,观察到患者体验的小幅改善,但在另一些小组中,变化则是混杂的,并且与团队行动并不一致。两个成功的小组似乎拥有强大的质量改进结构,并专注于相对简单的干预措施。团队负责人报告说,频繁的调查报告是改进的有力推动力,但他们需要更多的时间和支持来吸引工作人员和临床医生改变其行为。结论短期项目可能会在患者经验上取得可衡量的微小改进。要保持更大的变化,可能需要组织策略,积极参与的领导,文化变革,定期评估和绩效反馈以及解释和使用调查数据的经验

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号